Understanding
your data
Fluorometer
readings are based on the relationship between in
vivo fluorescence and the chlorophyll
a concentration. Interferences cause changes to this
relationship. Light history; temperature; turbidity, dissolved components
and algal health can all have significant effects on the amount
of fluorescence, independent
of the chlorophyll a concentration. In some cases the degree
of interference will depend on the instrument while in other cases
the interference is independent of the instrumentation.
The
impact of these factors can be controlled or corrected if the user
is aware of their effects. The most effective means of generating
accurate data is to take regular water samples for chlorophyll a
extraction. The in vivo fluorescence value must be noted
at the time of sampling. Once the exact chlorophyll a concentration
is determined via extraction, the in vivo fluorescence and
extracted data are compared and a correlation factor is developed.
If samples are taken when there is significant changes in water
quality and when the natural assemblage of phytoplankton changes
due to changes in location and environment, a tight correlation
will be obtained and accurate data will result. In practice it is
unrealistic to obtain a water sample every time there is an environmental
change but regular sampling, an awareness of the various factors
and sound sampling and extraction practices will result in strong
correlation between in vivo fluorescence and chlorophyll a
concentrations.
1.
Light History
Light history can have significant effects on the fluorescence in
algal cells. At low light levels, algal cells can optimize the light
uptake by pushing chloroplasts to the outer edge of the cell, or
by producing more chlorophyll per cell. Both of these responses
can result in fluorescence data that falsely represents the algal
biomass. At the other end of the spectrum at high light intensities
algal growth can be inhibited and fluorescence can under-estimate
algal biomass. To avoid this, conduct profiles at night, use an
opaque hose when sampling natural waters, or take samples for extraction.
The transport time of the water in the hose will dark-adapt cells
to an extent, significantly reducing fluorescence error caused by
variations in the light history of the cells.
| Mouse
over the scale to see how sunlight can effect in vivo
fluorescence. High light intensities in surface waters can cause
non-photochemical quenching which results in falsely low fluorescence
signals. |
2.
Temperature
All fluorophores are affected by temperature to varying extents.
Temperature has an inverse relationship with fluorescence. For example,
in a vertical profile, as the temperature decreases, the fluorescence
will increase independent of chlorophyll concentration. The in
vivo chlorophyll fluorescence changes at a rate of 1.4% per
°C. A temperature drop of 10°C in a vertical profile would
result in a 14% overestimation of chlorophyll due to temperature
changes alone.
| Mouse
over the scale to see how temperature effects fluorescence.
Several Turner Designs fluorometers have on board temperature
sensors that are used to automatically compensate temperature
effects. |
3.
Water Quality
DOM, chlorophyll degradation products, (pheophytins), accessory
pigments, (chlorophyll b and c), and turbidity can
also affect fluorescence response. If these factors are suspected
to be significant, a quick study should be conducted to look at
the effects of comparing the fluorescence from filtered water and
non-filtered water samples from below the photic zone where chlorophyll
concentrations would be at a minimum.
| Mouse
over the scale to see how turbidity can effects fluorescence
readings. As turbidity increases, the excitation light from
the fluorometer is scattered. At high turbidities, scattering
is high enough that it can effect the fluorescence reading and
result in a false positive reading. (The extent of this interference
is dependent on the instrument.) |
4.
Physiological State of the Algal Cells ('Health' of the Cell)
There
are three outcomes of light energy that are absorbed by chlorophyll
contained in algal cells; 1) it is channeled towards photosynthesis,
2)it is given off as heat, 3) it is re-emitted as fluorescence.
Due to this relationship, as one process increases the others decrease.
This is why 'healthy' algal cells will fluoresce less than a 'dying'
cell.
| Mouse
over the scale to see how growth rate effects fluorescence.
The growth rate of algal cells directly effects the relationship
between fluorescence and chlorophyll a concentration.
As growth rates increase, fluorescence will decrease, independent
of actual chlorophyll a concentration. |
Conclusion:
Despite the many environmental, physiological and instrument specific
factors that result in variation in the relationship between in
vivo fluorescence and actual chlorophyll a concentration,
in natural assemblages of algae, containing a variety of species
in a number of phases of growth, many of these factors tend to average
out. In cases where measurement of mono-cultures of algae or algal
blooms are occurring these factors may have a significant effect.
Also, awareness of light effects, water quality and your instrumentation
will give you the information you need to improve sampling practices
and conduct the appropriate number of sampling and extractions that
will result in accurate and informative in vivo fluorescence
data sets.